Tank killed before adopter could get him; MDAS kills dozens of animals in 1 day

tank

Tank wagged his tail at a volunteer. He kissed her fingers and rolled over for a belly rub. The only thing aggressive about Tank was the way he hugged volunteers (see photo). Yet Tank is the latest casualty at a shelter that labels dogs as “aggressive” and then kills them. Ori, a senior dog, was killed the day before Tank, another dog whose life ended at a shelter that claims it is “no kill.” Yet they consistently label dogs as “aggressive” before they kill them. Why, one might wonder, do they label gentle, friendly dogs as aggressive?

MDAS kills 34 animals in 24-hour period

Lifeisgoodwithdogs on Facebook

There is a method to the madness. According to “no kill” protocol, shelters are allowed to kill as many “aggressive” or “medical” animals as needed without it affecting their precious “save” rate. So often, shelters will label dogs as aggressive or sick so that they can be killed with the deaths not affecting their numbers.

Several articles have been written about Miami Dade Animal Services doing just this. In January, this article, “Miami Dade Animal Services labels dogs “aggressive” and then kills them” was published about this very issue.

Poor Tank was only three years old. He arrived at the shelter with taser barbs on his body. Had someone cruel tased the dog for “fun”? Was he tased by animal control officers? Why was this gentle dog treated so cruelly? Tank was at the shelter for over two months. He was available for adoption, but heartbreakingly, just when rescuers found him an adopter, the shelter killed him.

What happened? After two months — two long months — of having Tank available for adoption, one day someone arrived at the shelter and found that overnight Tank had turned aggressive? The rescuers who try to save the dogs from this shelter would scoff at that idea. Tank had taken up space for too long, and this shelter routinely labels dogs as aggressive so they can be killed without messing up their pretty statistics.

One person posted on Facebook:

“Friendly and loving, this cutie is ready to go home with you!”

Tank’s intake photo doesn’t show his gentle nature and affectionate personality, but his video does! Want your heart broken? Watch this video of Tank kissing the fingers of a visitor. His tail never stops wagging and he rolls over for a tummy rub. A more adorable, lovable dog would be hard to find.

Many tried to get Tank to safety. Life Is Good with Dogs posted Tank on their Facebook page. But the shelter didn’t send out a notice about Tank’s scheduled killing. They didn’t ask volunteers or rescue groups if they were actively networking Tank. They just killed him, along with 33 other dogs and cats. One might wonder how long it takes to kill that many animals. Do they rush through to get it done quickly? Do they have animals waiting in the same room where other animals are being killed to save time? Other shelters have done that.

This shelter, Miami Dade Animal Services, in one 24-hour period this week killed 21 cats and 13 dogs. Among the dogs were Tank and Ori. Ori’s story is told in “Dog adopted at shelter dumped 9 years later; shelter killed him in 4 days.” Unlike Tank, Ori was only given four days at the shelter to find a home. Tank had an adopter who wanted him. Both dogs could have lived, but they were killed by Miami Dade Animal Services, Tank after being (mis)labeled “aggressive” and Ori, whose death was probably labeled as “medically indicated.”

Please share this story. The mayor of Miami is running for reelection. One of his opponents has promised to help the animals of Miami Dade County. They need it!

Dog adopted at shelter dumped 9 years later; shelter killed him in 4 days

Please share to help stop other dogs from being killed

photo by Miami Shelter Big, Bullies Black

 

This sweet collie mix with a sparkle in his eyes, a wagging tail, and a relaxed tongue seemed darling. His heartless family had adopted him from the shelter as a puppy and abandoned him at the age of nine at the same shelter from which he had been adopted. Did they not want to care for him in his old age once he’d given them the best years of his life? Did they even look back at him and think of his fate — dying alone in a cold, concrete room by uncaring hands?

Volunteers were heartbroken when they arrived to assess Ori merely four days after his arrival, only to find that he had already been killed by the shelter. While owner surrenders can be killed immediately (because there is no “hold” time to look for an owner), this supposedly “no-kill” shelter certainly didn’t waste any time getting rid of an animal they thought unadoptable.

His video shows a long-coated dog suffering in the heat of Miami. The shelter wasted no time in labeling this senior as aggressive so they could kill him quickly. The person who took the video wrote:

Medical noes state he has some sensitivity in spine area, but no where did it say he was aggressive. With this sign slapped across his kennel card and an owner surrender, Ori’s chances of getting out alive are slim to none.”

But never fear — his death won’t show up as a “kill.” They will either say that he was aggressive or killed for medical reasons so that he won’t mess up their precious statistics. Mysteriously, this shelter kills very few adoptable dogs, but many aggressive dogs and dogs in medical need of “humane euthanasia.” They also lose a few dogs. That keeps their “save” rate looking great. And that’s what’s important — the save rate.

For this senior dog, the save rate didn’t help him. He was nine years old and might have lived for several years more. He had people interested in saving him. But the shelter only gave him four days to live. The volunteer also commented on the difference between his intake photo, where Ori seems alert, friendly, and happy, to the video just a few days later after he realized that his family had abandoned him. Ori is depressed and seems to have given up hope.

Then the shelter made sure he had no hope — only death at the end of a needle.

Ori was ID#A1004306. Please take a moment to remember him. He was abandoned to die by his family on May 21 and killed four days later. His owners will probably be able to adopt another puppy from this very shelter, keep that puppy for a few years and then abandon the dog to die when the dog becomes old, inconvenient or sick. Please share Ori’s life and his untimely death. His story was posted on a Miami dog rescue page on Facebook: Miami Shelter Big, Bullies Black & Been Around.

Dog was minutes from being killed because of hidden tick causing paralysis

dogtick.jpg

When Ollie, a ten-year-old sheltie stopped eating and found it difficult to walk, no one could figure out what was wrong with him — even the veterinarians. When it seemed as if the kindest thing to do was put Ollie out of his misery, fate — or luck — intervened.

Before the final act of injecting Ollie with the drugs that would allow him to painlessly die, the vet and a visiting veterinary student, Neena Golden, were petting him and comforting him. Both still struggled to understand “why an otherwise healthy dog was experiencing paralysis.” Neena noticed that there was a tick near Ollie’s ears. Apparently, even though Ollie had been wearing a tick collar, a tick had attached itself to Ollie during a recent camping trip.

Dr. Stone examined the tick and the area and in the press release from the veterinary hospital, wrote:

“The tick was very bloated, and there was lots of fecal material from the tick. It had obviously been there for a while.”

Before the camping trip, Ollie had been the picture of health. And once he began showing symptoms of an illness, his family didn’t wait to start having tests done. But all the blood tests, urinalysis, and X-rays didn’t show any reason for Ollie’s symptoms. They tried medication but it didn’t help. When Ollie couldn’t eat, walk or defecate on his own, the heartbroken family had to make a decision.

Luckily, once the vet students found the tick, the veterinarian remembered a rare condition that can be caused by a tick that he had heard about in vet school.

This rare but very real condition can occur, wrote the clinic: “…when the saliva secreted by the tick gets into the dog’s system over a prolonged period of time. It affects the dog’s neurological system and can cause paralysis. Only certain species of ticks can cause this damage, and removing the tick is completely curative.”

The hospital staff shaved Ollie to make sure there were no more ticks anywhere on his body. Once the family learned that this might be the issue, they took him home. Only 10 hours later, Ollie showed almost miraculous signs of improvement.

The press release has a happy ending. “Today, Ollie is back to normal – lively, active and ready to embark on his next outdoor adventure. Al plans to use a tick collar as well as ingestible tick prevention for their next excursion, per Dr. Stone’s recommendation.”

Please remember that your dogs and cats need to be not just on a heartworm preventative, but also on a flea and tick preventative. It might just save their lives!

‘The Status of All Things’ by Liz Fenton and Lisa Steinke

status

Rating: 4 1/2 stars

“The Status of All Things” is the second book by authors Liz Fenton and Lisa Steinke. Their first book, “Your Perfect Life,” was about who we are and how to recognize the good in our lives and appreciate it.

With this new book, they zero in on the subject of love. What is true love? How do we know we’ve found it? And are some things just fate?

Continue reading

Could Henry’s life have been saved? Volunteers will never know

henry

Henry was a young, sweet dog who was gentle and friendly. He seemed to get along with other dogs. In short, the kind of dog who would easily find a home. Yet “was” is the correct tense to use regarding sweet Henry because he was killed at the Hillsborough County Pet Resource Center. The volunteer group Rescue Me Tampa will always wonder if they could have saved him — had the shelter just shared the information about Henry with them. They wrote:

“RIP Little Henry !! We are so sorry! We know with a last call you would have gotten a foster, you deserved a rescue of foster plea. YOU were so sweet and perfect! Volunteers loved you. You deserved a chance, at the very least an email. Our hearts are completely broken tonight.”

Until this month, Rescue Me Tampa (RMT) would have been able to get the report with Henry on the “euth” list for the next day. They would have sent out Facebook pleas for a foster home for Henry. He had a upper respiratory infection, and space in the isolation unit is limited. Often, with a 10-day foster, a dog’s life is saved.

But Henry didn’t get that opportunity. Because of a software change, the shelter isn’t providing RMT with the information they need to save lives. In a previous article, “Dogs are needlessly dying; rescue group needs information to save them” this issue was addressed. The shelter communications representative called this writer to address some “inaccuracies” in the story.

However, after asking several pointed questions about shelter operations, this staff member could not give an answer to even one of the questions. She said she would get some answers and send a response. That was a week ago. Nothing has been received.

So, the questions remain. Why is the shelter not doing everything in its power to get these life-saving volunteers (who work each and every night, unpaid, unseen) the information they need? If the software isn’t in place, why isn’t the shelter director himself getting together the kill list and information about each of the dogs on that list and sending it to RMT?

The shelter director, Scott Trebatoski, is very concerned with the “numbers” and the no-kill statistics. But that didn’t help Henry, or dogs like him who are going to fall through the cracks.

Another question is why the shelter is closing off access to the outdoor runs where dogs typically urinate and defecate? They are now closing off that access at 3:00 in the afternoon and not opening the doors again until 6:00 the next morning. No house trained dog can last that long. So dogs who may enter the shelter house trained will be forced to defecate in their living area. Or try to hold it for 15 long hours.

See also “Shelter director on the hot seat.

Please take a moment to remember Henry — the dog who might have been saved, but who didn’t get a chance. He was ID#A1640335. Henry was at Hillsborough County Animal Services. Their phone number is 813-744-5660. Feel free to call and let the director, Scott Trebatoski, know how important it is that Rescue Me Tampa get the information they need to save lives. Be polite. Or read the first article (linked above) and write letters to the county commissioners about this. Please be an advocate for those who can’t speak.

Please note: Shelter director Scott Trebotski commented on this article. He wrote: “Henry was diagnosed with bacterial Pneumonia by the veterinary staff and was unresponsive to medical treatment. The veterinarian felt he was suffering and euthanized the dog for medical reasons. This dog would not have been treated any differently under the old reports or the new ones – this was a medical decision.”

Also note a post on Facebook about Trebotski’s post: “Henry was seen by a shelter vet on Monday. He was diagnosed with bacterial pneumonia. The director responded to the article stating that Henry was euthanized because he was not responding to treatment! Seen on Monday. Euthanized on Monday before 4. How did he have time to respond to treatment??? I was called by shelter representative to let me know Henry was euthanized. Why was I called? I had expressed interest in fostering Henry.”

Please also note that when a dog is killed because of medical reasons (or aggression), that death does not count as a dog killed under “no kill” statistics. So theoretically, a shelter could kill 50% of its dogs for medical reasons and still claim a 90% save rate — not suggesting that this is what Hillsborough County is doing, just a comment.

(Please note: This is a reprint from an article previously published on Examiner.com)

Shelter director on the hot seat after lies exposed

georgie

Local rescuers have been saying that the policies and procedures at the Hillsborough County Pet Resource Center in Tampa, Florida, are inhumane. Now, Steve Andrews of NewsChannel 8 has exposed some more of the shelter’s sordid story.

In his recent investigation, titled “Local shelter adopts pets to violent offenders,” Andrews exposes the fact that the shelter will adopt dogs to anyone — including people who just got out of jail. Violent offenders, felons, all are allowed to adopt as many dogs as they want. The list of those enjoined from owning animals is rarely up-to-date. While adopting out as many animals as possible — and to anyone — may make shelter numbers look good, this is hardly good for the animals. (See also: “Convicted dog fighters can adopt dogs from county shelter with failed policies.”)

The local rescuers have complained that Trebatoski’s only goal is to make the numbers look good. And they say he does it any way he can. They claim that people who find a stray dog have been told to let them go on the streets. By reducing intake and keeping the numbers artificially low, the shelter can tweak the numbers to make their “no-kill” statistics look better. Another Florida shelter, the Miami Dade Animal Services, has been accused of doing the same thing.

But Steve Andrews found out more about the less-than-ethical practices of the county shelter. In another piece of excellent investigative reporting, “Hillsborough Pet Resources director kills roosters, allegedly violates county policy,” Andrews reports that Trebatoski allegedly killed roosters using a method that was against the shelter policy. The former animal control director of Pet Services, Pam Perry, told Andrews that Trebatoski violated shelter protocol during his first week on the job. Instead of tranquilizing the roosters before injecting them with the substance that kills them, he injected it directly into a vein at the back of the roosters’ neck.

In the news clip, Trebatoski denies that he knew about that policy when he did that. Perry states unequivocally that she told him before he did it. Recently, an animal control officer was demoted for doing the same thing. Now, Pet Services is saying that the animal control officer was not demoted for the act, but rather for not following his supervisor’s direction.

Dogs are needlessly dying; rescue group needs information to save them” shares the information that the shelter is not providing the important information to the volunteer group Rescue Me Tampa to enable them to save the lives of the dogs at the shelter. After this article was posted on Examiner.com, the shelter’s Senior Media Relations Specialist, Communications and Digital Media, Kara Walker contacted this writer. She wanted to share “clarifications and corrections” to that article. During the course of our conversation, she was unable to answer any of the questions that were raised. She stated that she would get the answers and share them. She has not done so yet.

On the other hand, a recent piece in the Tampa Bay Times called “Kill rate in Hillsborough animal shelters down substantially, officials say,” is hardly an investigative piece. In fact, its picture, according to a local animal activist, is several years old. She posted on Facebook, “Put your waders on. The first problem is Scott never goes in the kennels. This is the same pic that was used a few years ago. This was a PR piece because the truth is coming out.” What Tampa Bay Times published appears to be a public relations ploy for Scott Trebatoski. But it won’t change the facts.

‘In My Hands: Memories of a Holocaust Rescuer’: nonfiction young adult book

inmyhands

Rating: 5 stars

In “In My Hands: Memories of a Holocaust Rescuer” by Irene Gut Opdyke, readers will learn about the Holocaust from the eyes of a young Polish girl who at the age of 17 had to endure horrors most children only dream about in their worst nightmares.

Opdyke (her married name) tells of growing up in a close-knit Polish family proud of their Polish heritage and living in a house where kindness was encouraged. Hurt animals were brought home and healed, dogs were loved, and the sisters were close. When Irene was 17, she decided she wanted to keep helping people by becoming a nurse. It was while she was in school, far from her family, when World War II broke out.

The story relates the horror of how the Russian soldiers abused the women they found, including Irene. Irene got lucky when her German looks and her ability to speak German helped her get a position working for the Nazis in a hotel. The hotel backed up to the ghetto, and Irene saw firsthand the horrors of what was happening there. It was obvious that the Germans wanted to kill all the Jews. And the German officers talked freely in the restaurant about the goal of making the town free of all Jews. The man in charge of the kitchen was kind and looked the other way when Irene started helping the Jews.

First it was simply putting food in a metal box and shoving it into the ghetto through a hole she made under the fence. That escalated when she got Jews to help in the laundry room. She would pass on news she heard from the officers about deportations to her friends — because the Jews working in the laundry became friends. When she learned about the last final “action” to rid the town of all Jews, she knew she had to do more.

That’s when the book really becomes almost incredible — reading about the risks that Irene took on behalf of people she barely knew. She risked her life, she did whatever she had to to make sure that the Jews she saved remained safe. The book is written beautifully with the help of author Jennifer Armstrong, whose writing beautifully brings out the beauty of the human spirit and the cruelty of which humans are capable — all in the course of a few pages.

This nonfiction book should be included in any study of World War II from middle school through high school. While there is mention of rape, it is not graphic. It’s unusual in that most WWII memoirs are written from a Jewish perspective. This one is written from the perspective and voice of a Polish, Catholic girl.

‘Hensel and Gretel: Ninja Chicks’ by Corey Rosen Schwartz and Rebecca J. Gomez

ninja

Rating: 4 1/2 stars

The Ninja warrior animals return courtesy of Corey Rosen Schwartz and coauthor Rebecca J. Gomez. Dan Santat’s colorful and heavily stylized illustrations accompany the rhyming fairy tale.

The two sisters have trained at the local dojo and worked diligently on their ninja skills. Their mother was stolen away and when their father disappeared, they found suspicious fox tracks around. Following the tracks, they left a trail of breadcrumbs so they could find their way back in the deep dark woods.

Continue reading

‘Summer at Little Beach Street Bakery’ by Jenny Colgan

summerbakery

Rating: 4 1/2 stars

“Summer at Little Beach Street Bakery” by Jenny Colgan is the sequel to “Little Beach Street Bakery.” Colgan carefully begins the sequel with enough background information for a new reader to feel up-to-speed on the backstory. But really, why not just get the first book and read it and then read the sequel.

Both books are well worth reading, even if just for a light summer book to read poolside or, better yet, at the beach. Of course, after reading the books, most of us wish we were in Cornwall, on the beach, reading the books. Also, be forewarned: This book may encourage you, even force you, to eat many many carbs. The descriptions of the aroma and taste and texture of freshly baked bread will drive any bread lover crazy. This reviewer can’t eat gluten, so it was especially torturous.

The story is what makes the books so enjoyable. And the story consists of many lovable characters — the most lovable of whom is Polly. Polly, in the first book, loses her business and her man. She has no money and no job, but just enough to rent a tiny apartment over an abandoned bakery on an island with a causeway to the mainland. Because of the tides, the causeway can only be crossed at certain times of day which makes going anywhere off the tiny island require planning.

To make the time pass, Polly does what she loves and bakes bread. The aroma of the baking bread ends up making most islanders secretly buy her bread since they all hate the factory white bread that is sold in the island’s bakery. Nothing is actually baked in the bakery, and the owner is a sour old woman.

In this sequel, Polly is happily baking bread and running two bakeries on the island. When Mrs. Manse, the owner of the bakeries, dies, her sister inherits everything and send her son, a miserable human being, to run them. Polly, in the time between the two books, has bought the old lighthouse on the island, and she and Huckle, the honey-man from the first book with whom she fell in love, live there with their puffin, Neil.

Colgan’s stories work so well because she is wonderful at creating fascinating characters. They are real and filled with good and bad. Some are funny and some are tragic. All make mistakes, and all — even the bad guys — have at least one redeeming quality. It may be hard to find, or it may show up almost after the book has ended, but it’s there.

It’s the richness of character and characters that keep the reader turning the pages. It’s also the fabulous characters that make the reader want to read the sequel. Of course, there is also the fact that within the pages of each book the reader will encounter death, tragedy, romance, humor, wonderful food and the beauty of the Cornish countryside.

Enjoy yourself, and treat yourself to both books.

Please note: This review is based on the advance reader’s copy provided by William Morrow, the publisher, for review purposes.

Dogs tortured then killed after ‘free to good home’ ads

Three of the dead dogs pictured here were listed on local Facebook pages as “free to good home.”

The remains of 4 dead dogs -- at least 3 died horrible deaths-slide0
Mary Metze
View all6 photos

Please share to help stop other dogs from being killed

Mary Metze

The dead husky has a story. She was found dead, wrapped in a shower curtain. She was listed as “free to good home,” and the notice stated that she was purebred and great with kids. In spite of that endorsement, the family “couldn’t” keep her because they were having a baby. She was found dead within weeks of that posting. The person who shared these pictures wrote:

This poor girl has had her face literally peeled from her body and there are deep puncture wounds between her front legs. I do not know what caused them but I can say with CERTAINTY she did not die quickly or peacefully.”

When a local rescuer called the woman who had placed that ad and given the husky to its killer, the woman blamed the local rescues for the dog’s death — not the sadistic killer who tortured the dog before killing it. “It’s the rescue’s fault because they won’t help the average Joe. So I couldn’t get a rescue to take the dog.” She didn’t want the dog to go to the local shelter to be killed, so she gave the dog to a stranger.

The dog died a horrific death. The person who took the picture shared that, “It looked like the face had been surgically removed.” If the owner had taken the dog to her local vet to be killed, it would have been a kinder end.

The two dogs laid out next to each other (see slideshow pictures) were also listed on a local Facebook page as “two bonded pits free to good home.” It appears that they suffered greatly before dying. The poster wrote, “There are bite wounds and lacerations all over their bodies. They’ve been here, dumped like garbage after obviously having been fought. They were most likely dumped still alive and left to slowly bleed out. If they were lucky, they got to pass out before succumbing to death.” When the former owner of those dogs was called, even after repeated calls, there was no response.

The last picture doesn’t even look like a dog. It’s the bones of a dog who died anonymously and whose body was disposed of as if it were a thing of no consequence, a piece of garbage. There were multiple broken bones in the garbage bag, but the body was there so long that it’s impossible to determine how the dog died. But the person who found the remains says, “I’d be willing to bet money it was a ‘free to good home’ baby as well.”

This all took place and still takes place in Kilpatrick, Alabama, where the dead and dying dogs are dumped. Animal rescuers go there to try to help those who are still alive. The local law enforcement is no help at all. Unless there is proof that a dog was dumped alive, there is no crime. Dumping a dead dog — no matter how it died — is just against a local ordinance and punishable by a fine. This is in the area where the local animal control officer shot two dogs instead of catching them last year according to WHNT19 News.

Free to good home? There is no such thing.

When you get a “free” dog or cat, it’s not really free. That’s because responsible pet owners have their dogs seen by a veterinarian, vaccinated, and kept on preventatives (like heartworm and flea preventatives) to keep them healthy and happy. Responsible owners don’t give their animals to strangers.

Free to good home?

If someone isn’t willing to pay a rehoming fee, run away. If you MUST rehome a dog or cat, demand a veterinary reference. Most vets will provide that, especially if the prospective adopter gives permission. Make sure that current or past pets were kept up-to-date on vaccinations and were spayed or neutered. If people can’t afford to give their dog proper medical care, they shouldn’t get your dog. And if they can’t give you any references (personal and/or work), don’t give them your dog!

Your pet is helpless and dependent on you for its life, security and happiness. You owe it to the creature that depends on you to make sure that you are delivering it into a safe home. Instead of allowing someone to take the dog or cat home, insist on bringing the pet to the potential new home yourself so you can see where it will live. Also, call and check on how the new situation is working out. Make the adopter(s) sign an agreement that if they ever don’t want the pet, they will call you and give the dog or cat back to you first.

There are just too many animals who are passed from family to family, confused and scared, and who end up chained outside, unwanted, unloved. There are too many cats who are dumped to fend for themselves in hostile environments — cats who once were loved and petted and now dodge stones thrown by ignorant children.

If you know anyone who needs to rehome a pet, please share this information with that person. There are many rescues that will do a courtesy posting of animals in need of homes. The rescue might even be willing to help with references and to make sure that the animal is going to a good home. Your pet is depending on you — don’t let it down!

The original Facebook post can be found here. Some of the groups who help areFurever Friends of the South K9 Rescue and 2nd Chance Shelter.

‘The Cat with Seven Names’ by Tony Johnston and Christine Davenier

catwith7names

Rating: 5 stars

Sometimes a picture book is so perfect, it begs to be shared and discussed and read over and over again. “The Cat with Seven Names” is just such a picture book. Tony Johnston is the talented author who writes about community and urban settings with aplomb. Her “Any Small Goodness” is also a wonderful book for 4th and 5th graders.

In “The Cat with Seven Names,” the reader is hooked from the first page. “A cat came to my back door one day. Gray, with white paws. Nobody visits me much. I put down the book I was reading (I am a librarian), and I let him in.”

Immediately, Johnston sets the story. Here is someone who is lonely (“Nobody visits me much”) who opens the door for the cat. This pattern is repeated with different people — all of whom share a bit of loneliness; all of whom benefit from the company of a slightly fat cat; all of whom feed the cat; and all of whom are very different in terms of nationality, age, and situation.

First comes the librarian. Next the cat visits an older gentleman whose family is “grown and gone.” The next house is that of un señor who talks partly en español, in Spanish. He also lives alone and loves the idea of a cat to keep him and his dog company. The list goes on, including a war veteran who is homeless. Johnston tactfully tackles this subject, opening the door for discussion of PTSD and homelessness for those readers of appropriate age.

There are so many wonderful aspects of this book in terms of teaching that they will not all fit into this review. A few highlights would be to use this book to teach point of view (POV). Each of the characters, all of whom tell their story in first person, has his/her own style of narration, even a particular language style. What a great way to teach students about character and personal voice.

The book is also a great tool for discussing social issues like growing old, immigrants, homelessness, and the lasting effects of war on veterans.

This review would not be complete without a mention of the stunning watercolor artwork throughout the book. Davenier’s illustrations are simple but incredibly effective. The bright colors bring happiness to the pages while the illustrations showing the homeless veteran are of a cooler, bluer palette. His face is in shadow for two of the pictures, but in the final illustration of him with the cat, he is holding the cat in his arms, and the picture is lighter with warmer colors. Throughout, there is wonderful use of white space to focus the eye on what is important.

This picture book is one that could be used for a wide range of ages and purposes. It’s great for students of all ages. Younger students will just enjoy the stories and the happy ending. Older students can study the author’s craft and analyze why it works. They can also try their hand at creating their own books about different characters finding a stray dog or cat and what happens to each.

Please note: This review is based on the final hardcover book provided by the publisher, Charlesbridge Publishing, for review purposes.

‘Night on Fire’ by Ronald Kidd: Middle grade fiction about civil rights

night on fire

Rating: 5 stars

“Night on Fire” by Ronald Kidd is a middle grade historical fiction novel about the Civil Rights Era. It’s told from an unusual perspective, that of a thirteen-year-old white girl living in Anniston, Alabama. Her family is not wealthy. In fact, her father was demoted (a fact this is alluded to) and her mother had to go to work. There is a baby brother and a black nanny/maid, Lavender.

Billie is satisfied with the way things are in her town. There is the “tradition” that blacks don’t shop at the same stores as whites, and they don’t live on the same side of town. Her friend and neighbor Grant McCall comes from the North. His father is a journalist, and Grant wants to be a photographer.

Billie’s father treats Lavender, whom Billie considers a second mother, with contempt, and he is openly disrespectful to her. Billie also is present during the state spelling bee, where the students from the black high school, Cobb, challenge the winner to face their winner in a contest. They are booed down, and the black protesters begin to chant and spell words like liberty and prejudice. Mr. McCall steps up and quells the emotions by proposing that next year, all students be allowed to participate. The judge says “We’ll consider it.”

Continue reading